Complete Guide to the NIST Cybersecurity Framework

The NIST Cybersecurity Framework (NIST CSF) emerged as a pivotal initiative by the National Institute of Standards and Technology to fortify the security of the United States’ crucial infrastructure. Its inception aimed at creating a unified set of standards, objectives, and terminologies to enhance information security and mitigate the consequences of cyberattacks. By fostering a common language, NIST CSF facilitates improved decision-making and fosters a standardized approach across different sectors, crucial for combating cyber threats like phishing and ransomware.

Introduced in 2014 and later updated to Version 1.1 in 2018, NIST CSF has undergone significant evolution. Although a draft Version 2.0 was released for public feedback in August 2023 and closed for comment in November 2023, the final release of Version 2.0 is anticipated. This framework has demonstrated remarkable flexibility, prompting NIST to recommend its adoption by organizations of all sizes and industries voluntarily.

The framework is structured around five core functions that embody the capabilities a comprehensive cybersecurity program should possess: Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, and Recover. These functions are further broken down into categories and subcategories that detail leading information security practices, incident response strategies, and effective ransomware recovery techniques.

‘Special Publications’ take a deeper dive into specific areas

Beyond the core framework, NIST has published over 200 special documents addressing various facets of cybersecurity risk management, ranging from identity access control and protective technology management to incident response and artificial intelligence applications.

One of the most influential of these documents is NIST 800-53, designed to support organizations in complying with the Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA). This set of controls is mandatory for federal agencies and their supply chain partners, including defense contractors, underlining the framework’s extensive reach and utility in establishing robust cybersecurity defenses across multiple sectors.

Top Security Control Families in NIST SP 800-53

The NIST SP 800-53 publication is a cornerstone document that delineates over 1,000 specific controls across 20 distinct control families. These families categorize the wide array of cybersecurity measures recommended for robust information security management. Below is an outline of the NIST 800-53 control families, reflecting their critical roles in safeguarding information systems:

• AC – Access Control: Strategies and mechanisms to limit access to information systems.
• PS – Personnel Security: Procedures to ensure that personnel with access to sensitive information are trustworthy.
• AU – Audit and Accountability: Keeping detailed logs to monitor and analyze actions that could affect security.
• PE – Physical and Environmental Protection: Safeguarding physical premises and the environment around critical systems.
• AT – Awareness and Training: Educating users and administrators about security risks and controls.
• PL – Planning: Development, documentation, and implementation of security plans.
• CA – Security Assessment and Authorization: Evaluating the effectiveness of security controls and authorizing system operations.
• PT – PII Processing and Transparency: Managing personal information with transparency and accountability.
• CM – Configuration Management: Ensuring security through controlled changes and configurations.
• PM – Program Management: Oversight and management of security programs.
• CP – Contingency Planning: Preparing for, responding to, and recovering from system disruptions.
• RA – Risk Assessment: Identifying and analyzing risks to organizational operations.
• IA – Identification and Authentication: Verifying the identity of users and devices.
• SC – System and Communications Protection: Protecting communications and control processes.
• IR – Incident Response: Responding to and managing security incidents.
• SI – System and Information Integrity: Ensuring accuracy and trustworthiness of system information.
• MA – Maintenance: Performing maintenance to ensure it does not affect security adversely.
• SA – System and Services Acquisition: Acquiring systems and services that meet security requirements.
• MP – Media Protection: Protecting digital and physical media containing sensitive information.
• SR – Supply Chain Risk Management: Managing risks from the supply chain to reduce vulnerabilities.

Regarded as the cybersecurity benchmark by federal agencies, NIST 800-53 also ensures compliance with the Federal Information Processing Standard Publication 200 (FIPS 200), mandatory for government entities and affiliates.

Moreover, NIST Special Publication 800-171, designed to protect Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) in nonfederal systems and organizations, is pivotal for defense contractors engaging with the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD), further illustrating the breadth and importance of the NIST cybersecurity framework in national security and beyond.

The NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) is a versatile tool designed to enhance cybersecurity measures across various sectors. Initially crafted to safeguard the nation’s critical infrastructure, its applicability has broadened significantly over time. Today, the CSF is embraced by a diverse range of entities, including universities, research institutions, public corporations, and private businesses, highlighting its widespread relevance and utility.

While the CSF’s origins are rooted in protecting critical infrastructure, its comprehensive approach to cybersecurity has made it a go-to resource for organizations seeking to fortify their digital defenses. It’s important to note, however, that for the majority of businesses, adherence to the CSF remains a voluntary commitment. This flexibility allows entities of all sizes and sectors to tailor the framework’s guidelines to their specific needs, making it an invaluable asset for any organization aiming to enhance its cybersecurity posture.

The NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) provides a blueprint for organizations to develop robust cybersecurity programs. It’s built around core components designed to streamline cybersecurity practices across various sectors. These core components are essential for understanding and implementing the framework effectively:

Framework Core

The Framework Core is the backbone of the NIST CSF, organizing cybersecurity activities into five primary functions that represent the lifecycle of managing cybersecurity risk:

1. Identify: Develop an organizational understanding to manage cybersecurity risk to systems, assets, data, and capabilities.
2. Protect: Implement safeguards to ensure delivery of critical infrastructure services.
3. Detect: Define the appropriate activities to identify the occurrence of a cybersecurity event.
4. Respond: Specify the actions to take regarding a detected cybersecurity incident.
5. Recover: Identify activities to restore any capabilities or services impaired due to a cybersecurity incident.

Each function is further divided into categories and subcategories, which outline specific objectives and actions. Informative references are also provided to offer guidance and resources for achieving these objectives.

Implementation Tiers

These tiers describe the degree to which an organization’s cybersecurity risk management practices exhibit the characteristics defined in the Framework Core, ranging from Partial (Tier 1) to Adaptive (Tier 4). They help organizations assess their approach to managing cybersecurity risk for organizational systems and guide the progression toward more sophisticated practices.

Framework Profiles

Profiles are unique alignments of an organization’s requirements, risk tolerances, and resources against the desired outcomes of the Framework Core. They enable organizations to establish a roadmap for reducing cybersecurity risk consistent with their mission, needs, and objectives.

By integrating these core components, the NIST CSF facilitates a strategic, flexible, and scalable approach to cybersecurity, allowing organizations to adapt the framework according to their specific needs, risk levels, and business environments.

The Framework Core

At the heart of the NIST CSF is the Framework Core, which is instrumental in outlining the essential functions and activities of an efficient cybersecurity program. It comprises:

• Functions: These are the foundational elements that organize basic cybersecurity activities into five main areas: Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, and Recover. Each function is a high-level goal aimed at managing and mitigating cybersecurity risk.
• Categories: Within each function, categories provide subdivisions related to cybersecurity outcomes and activities.
• Subcategories: For each category, subcategories further break down specific objectives into actionable steps.
• Informative References: These are specific standards, guidelines, and practices that support the achievement of the subcategories.

Implementation Tiers

The CSF also introduces four implementation tiers that serve as benchmarks for assessing an organization’s cybersecurity maturity and the extent to which NIST controls are applied:

• Tier 1—Partial: This tier indicates an ad-hoc and reactive cybersecurity posture with limited awareness of organizational cybersecurity risk.
• Tier 2—Risk-Informed: At this level, an organization has a risk-informed approach but may not have fully systematic cybersecurity practices.
• Tier 3—Repeatable: Organizations at this tier have established and repeatable cybersecurity practices that are well-managed and informed by organizational risk.
• Tier 4—Adaptive: This highest tier represents a dynamic and proactive approach to cybersecurity, with practices that are adapted based on continuous risk assessment and organizational learning.

Framework Profiles

Profiles in the CSF enable organizations to map their specific security needs, objectives, risk tolerance, and resources against the desired outcomes defined in the Framework Core. This facilitates the customization of the CSF to align with an organization’s unique context, enhancing its effectiveness in achieving specific cybersecurity goals.

By understanding and leveraging these core components, organizations can systematically address cybersecurity challenges, enhance their resilience against cyber threats, and effectively communicate their cybersecurity posture across all levels of the organization.

The framework core at the heart of the CSF consists of five cybersecurity functions. Those five functions then consist of 23 categories in all. The categories, in turn, consist of 108 sub-categories listing the requirements and controls necessary to satisfy each category, well as “informative references” that provide a list of additional frameworks and other resources to consult for more information.

Keep in mind that the NIST CSF is not intended as a one-size-fits-all framework. Each organization may decide which functions, categories, and subcategories it will comply with.

The functions, with their categories and subcategories, are as follows.

1. Identify:

Develop the organizational understanding to manage cybersecurity risk to systems, assets, data, and capabilities.

Asset management (ID.AM):

• Your enterprise has identified the data, personnel, devices, systems, and facilities essential to its critical business services.
• Your enterprise has prioritized those assets according to their importance and the organization’s risk strategy.
• Your enterprise manages its assets according to their priority. This means that your organization has achieved these goals:
  • Taken inventory of all physical devices and systems.
  • Taken inventory of all software platforms and applications.
  • Mapped its communication and data flows.
  • Cataloged its external information systems.
  • Prioritized its resources (hardware, devices, data, time, personnel, and software) according to their classification, level of importance (criticality), and business value.
  • Established cybersecurity roles and responsibilities enterprise-wide and for third-party stakeholders (suppliers, customers, partners).

Business environment (ID.BE):

• Your teams understand the organization’s mission, objectives, stakeholders, and activities as prioritized.
• Your teams use this information to inform cybersecurity roles, responsibilities, and risk management decisions. This means that they have:
  • Identified and communicated your organization’s role in the supply chain.
  • Identified and communicated your organization’s place in critical infrastructure and its industry sector.
  • Established and communicated its priorities for the mission, business objectives, and activities.
  • Mapped its dependencies and critical functions for the delivery of critical services.
  • Established resilience requirements to support the delivery of critical services during normal operations, during an attack, under duress, and during recovery.

Governance (ID.GV):

Cybersecurity risk managers and the board know, understand, and use your enterprise security policies, procedures, and processes to manage and monitor the organization’s regulatory, legal, risk, environmental, and operational requirements.

• You’ve established and communicated the cybersecurity policy.
• Your organization has coordinated and aligned cybersecurity roles and responsibilities with internal roles and external partners.
• Managers understand and are overseeing compliance with legal and regulatory requirements regarding cybersecurity, including privacy and civil liberties obligations.
• Your governance and risk management processes address cybersecurity risks.

Risk assessment (ID.RA):

Your organization understands the cybersecurity risk to its operations (including mission, functions, image or reputation), assets, and people.

• You’ve identified and documented the vulnerabilities to your assets.
• You’ve arranged to get cyber threat intelligence from information-sharing forums and sources.
• You’ve identified and documented the threat environment, which is the threats your enterprise faces from internal and external sources.
• You’ve identified potential business impacts of risks and threats, as well as the likelihood of their occurring.
• You’ve used threats, vulnerabilities, likelihoods, and impacts to determine overall risk.
• You’ve identified and prioritized risk responses.

Risk management strategy (ID.RM):

Your organization has established its priorities, constraints, risk tolerances, and assumptions and uses them to support operational risk decisions.

• You’ve established and actively managed risk management processes, with stakeholders’ agreement.
• You’ve determined and clearly expressed your organization’s risk tolerance.
• In determining risk tolerance, you’ve considered your enterprise’s role in critical infrastructure and have considered risk analyses of your sector.

Supply chain risk management (ID.SC):

Your enterprise has set priorities, constraints, risk tolerances, and assumptions and has defined processes to identify, assess, and manage supply chain risks.

• You’ve identified, established, and assessed supply chain risk management processes and manage these with stakeholder agreement.
• You’ve identified, prioritized, and assessed the suppliers and third-party partners of your information systems, components, and services using a cyber-supply-chain risk assessment process.
• You use contracts with suppliers and third-party partners to meet the objectives of your cybersecurity program and cyber-supply-chain risk management plan.
• You routinely assess your suppliers and third-party partners using audits, test results, or other evaluations to confirm that they are meeting their contractual obligations.
• You plan and test response and recovery procedures with suppliers and third-party providers.

2. Protect:

Assure that critical infrastructure services remain available. Categories and sub-categories are: 

• Identity management, authentication, and access control (PR.AC):
  Only authorized users, processes, and devices can access physical and logical assets and associated facilities. How you manage this access depends on the risks associated with unauthorized access.
  • Issue, manage, verify, revoke, and audit identities and credentials for authorized devices, users, and processes.
  • Manage and protect physical access to assets.
  • Manage remote access.
  • Manage user accounts’ access permissions and administrative privileges using the principles of least privilege needed to do one’s job and separation of duties.
    Protect network integrity using such means as network segregation and network segmentation, as well as updated antivirus software and secure data backup.
  • Proof and bind identities to credentials and have them asserted in interactions.
  • Authenticate users, devices, and other assets commensurate with the risk of each transaction.

Awareness and training (PR.AT):

Your organization’s personnel and partners receive cybersecurity awareness education and are trained to perform their cybersecurity-related duties and responsibilities consistent with policies, procedures, and agreements.

• All users are informed and trained.
• Privileged users understand their roles and responsibilities.
• Third-party stakeholders (suppliers, customers, partners, and so forth) understand their roles and responsibilities.
• Senior executives understand their roles and responsibilities.
• Physical and cybersecurity personnel understand their roles and responsibilities.

Data security (PR.DS):

Your organization manages data in concert with its data risk strategy to protect the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of information.

• Your data at rest is protected.
• Your data is protected while in transit.
• You manage your assets as they are being transferred, removed, and disposed of.
• You maintain adequate storage capacity to ensure that your data is always available.
• You protect against data leaks and have established plans for recovery efforts.
• You verify software, firmware, and information integrity.
• Your development and testing environment(s) are separate from the production environment.

Information protection processes and procedures: (PR.IP):

Your enterprise uses security policies that address purpose, scope, roles, responsibilities, management commitment, and coordination among organizational entities, processes, and procedures to manage the protection of information systems and assets.

• You have a baseline configuration of information technology/industrial control systems incorporating security principles (the “concept of least functionality”).
• You have a systems development lifecycle for managing your systems.
• You have processes for configuration change control.
• You conduct, maintain, and test information backups.
• Your physical operating environment for organizational assets meets policies and regulations.
• You destroy data according to your policies.
• You have improved your data protection processes.
• You share the effectiveness of protection technologies.
• You have response and recovery plans, and you manage them.
• You regularly test your response and recovery plans.
• Your human resources practices include cybersecurity measures such as deprovisioning and personnel screening.
• You have a vulnerability management plan.

Maintenance (PR.MA):

According to policies and procedures, your organization maintains and repairs its industrial control and information system components.

• You maintain and repair organizational assets and log those activities with approved and controlled tools.
• Remote maintenance of organizational assets is approved, logged, and performed in a manner that prevents unauthorized access.

Protective technology (PR.PT):

You manage technical security solutions to assure that systems and assets are secure and resilient, as well as consistent with organizational policies, procedures, and agreements.

• You document and review audit/log records according to policy.
• You protect removable media and restrict its use according to policy.
• You configure systems to provide users with only what they need (“principle of least privilege”).
• Your communications and control networks are protected.
• You use mechanisms such as fail-safe, load balancing, and hot swap for greater resilience.

3. Detect:

Develop and implement activities to identify cybersecurity events. Categories and subcategories are:

Anomalies and events (DE.AE):

The organization knows when anomalous activity occurs on your systems.

• You maintain and manage a baseline of network operations and expected data flows for users and systems.
• The organization analyzes detected events to understand attack targets and methods.
• Systems collect and correlate event data from multiple sources and sensors.
• You know the impacts of cybersecurity events.
• You’ve established incident alert thresholds.

Security continuous monitoring (DE.CM):

The organization continuously monitors its information systems and assets to identify cybersecurity events and verify the effectiveness of protective measures. Monitoring includes these areas:

• The enterprise network.
• The physical environment.
• External service providers’ activity.
• Employee activity.

Monitoring should check for anomalies, including:

• Malicious code.
• Unauthorized mobile code.
• Unauthorized users, connections, devices, and software.
• Vulnerabilities.

Detection process (DE.DP):

The organization maintains and tests its detection processes and procedures to ensure it is aware of anomalous events.

• You’ve defined roles and responsibilities for detection.
• Detection activities comply with requirements.
• The organization has tested its detection processes.
• Event detection information is communicated to those who need to know.
• You continually improve the detection processes.

4. Respond:

Develop and implement responses to detected cybersecurity events.

Response planning (RS.RP):

The enterprise has developed processes and procedures for responding to cybersecurity incidents.

• You follow your response plan during or after an incident.

Communications (RS.CO):

You coordinate response activities with internal and external stakeholders, including law enforcement agencies.

• Employees know their roles and the order of operations when a response is needed.
• Incidents are reported according to your criteria.
• Your teams share information consistent with your response plans.
• You coordinate with stakeholders according to your response plans.
• You volunteer information on security incidents with external stakeholders for broader awareness.

Analysis: (RS.AN):

The organization analyzes its response to cybersecurity incidents to improve and support recovery activities.

• You investigate detection system notifications.
• Your teams understand each incident’s impacts.
• You perform forensic analysis.
• You categorize incidents consistent with your response plans.
• You have processes for receiving, analyzing, and responding to vulnerabilities disclosed to the organization from internal and external sources (e.g. internal testing, security bulletins or security researchers).

Mitigation (RS.MI):

The organization works to prevent the expansion of events, mitigate events’ effects, and resolve incidents.

• Incidents are contained.
• Incidents are mitigated.
• You mitigate newly identified vulnerabilities or document them as accepted risks.

Improvements (RS.IM):

You work to improve the organization’s responses to security threats, events, and incidents by incorporating lessons learned from current and previous detection/response activities.

• Your response plans incorporate lessons learned.
• You update response strategies as needed.

5. Recover:

Develop and implement the appropriate actions to take upon detecting a cybersecurity event. Categories and sub-categories are:

Recovery planning (RC.RP):

You maintain recovery processes and procedures to restore systems or assets affected by cybersecurity incidents.

• You follow your recovery plan during or after each cybersecurity incident.

Improvements (RC.IM):

You improve recovery planning and processes by incorporating lessons learned into future activities.

• Recovery plans incorporate lessons learned.
• You continually update your recovery strategies.

Communications (RC.CO):

The organization coordinates its restoration activities with internal and external parties, including coordinating centers, internet service providers, owners of attacking systems, victims, other computer security incident response teams, and vendors.

• The organization manages public relations post-incident.
• The enterprise repairs its reputation after an incident.

You notify internal and external stakeholders as well as executive and management teams about recovery activities.

NIST compliance encompasses adherence to standards set by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), with the specific requirements varying across different NIST frameworks. Each framework targets distinct aspects of cybersecurity and information protection, catering to various organizational needs and regulatory demands.

NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF)

The NIST CSF is a voluntary framework designed to help organizations manage and mitigate cybersecurity risk. While not mandatory, aligning with the NIST CSF can streamline the process of adhering to other regulatory requirements, such as the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX). By implementing the practices outlined in the NIST CSF, organizations can enhance their security posture efficiently, potentially reducing the time and costs associated with compliance in other areas.

NIST SP 800-53

Compliance with NIST SP 800-53 is essential for meeting the requirements of the Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA) and the Federal Information Processing Standards Publication 200 (FIPS 200). This framework is comprehensive, covering 20 control families that span access control, incident response, business continuity, disaster recovery, and more. Adopting the security controls specified in NIST SP 800-53 not only ensures compliance with federal regulations but also significantly bolsters an organization’s security infrastructure.

NIST SP 800-171

Targeted specifically at defense contractors, NIST SP 800-171 provides guidelines for safeguarding “controlled unclassified information” (CUI). Compliance with this standard is critical for meeting the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) requirements, a prerequisite for organizations aiming to secure contracts with the Department of Defense (DoD). By following NIST SP 800-171, defense contractors can ensure that their handling of CUI adheres to the stringent security standards demanded by federal defense agencies.

In summary, NIST compliance varies significantly depending on the framework in question. From voluntary adoption of the NIST CSF to mandatory adherence to NIST SP 800-53 and SP 800-171 for specific regulatory and contractual obligations, understanding the nuances of each framework is crucial for organizations navigating the complex landscape of cybersecurity standards.

The NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF), officially known as the Framework for Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity, is designed to support organizations in effectively managing cybersecurity risks. Originally intended to bolster the resilience of critical infrastructure sectors, its applicability has been recognized as beneficial for a broad spectrum of enterprises focused on enhancing their cybersecurity risk management practices. The U.S. Department of Commerce advocates for the universal adoption of the NIST CSF, highlighting its capacity to pinpoint and mitigate cybersecurity vulnerabilities across diverse organizational contexts.

Further guidance is provided in NIST.IR.8170, “Approaches for Federal Agencies to Use the Cybersecurity Framework,” which outlines eight strategic methods for integrating the CSF into organizational operations. These approaches include:

1. Integrating Enterprise and Cybersecurity Risk Management: Facilitating communication through universally understood risk terminology.
2. Managing Cybersecurity Requirements: Utilizing a framework that supports the integration and prioritization of cybersecurity needs.
3. Aligning Cybersecurity and Acquisition Processes: Articulating cybersecurity requirements and priorities in clear, common language to streamline integration with procurement processes.
4. Evaluating Organizational Cybersecurity: Employing a standardized measurement scale and self-assessment criteria to assess cybersecurity posture.
5. Managing the Cybersecurity Program: Identifying required cybersecurity outcomes, establishing common controls, and distributing responsibilities for achieving those outcomes.
6. Understanding Cybersecurity Risk: Adopting a standardized structure for organizing and comprehending cybersecurity risks.
7. Reporting Cybersecurity Risks: Utilizing a universally comprehensible format for communicating cybersecurity risks.
8. Informing the Tailoring Process: Reconciling cybersecurity requirements comprehensively to guide the customization of the cybersecurity framework to meet specific organizational needs.

By embracing these strategies, organizations can leverage the NIST CSF to not only address existing cybersecurity challenges but also anticipate and mitigate future risks, thereby strengthening their overall cybersecurity posture. The versatility of the NIST CSF makes it a valuable tool for organizations of all sizes and sectors, underscoring its role as a cornerstone of contemporary cybersecurity risk management strategies.

Preparing for a NIST audit involves a series of steps to ensure that your organization’s cybersecurity practices align with the specific NIST standards applicable to your operations. Whether you’re gearing up for an audit against the NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF), NIST SP 800-53, NIST SP 800-171, or any other relevant standard, following a structured checklist can help streamline the process. Here’s a comprehensive checklist to guide your preparation:

1. Understand the Applicable NIST Standard

• Identify which NIST standards are relevant to your organization.
• Obtain the latest version of the applicable NIST publication(s).

2. Conduct a Gap Analysis

• Compare your current cybersecurity practices against the NIST requirements.
• Document areas of non-compliance or partial compliance.

3. Develop an Action Plan

• Prioritize the gaps identified based on risk assessment.
• Outline steps to address each gap, including resources needed and timelines.

4. Implement Required Controls

• Start with high-priority areas identified in the gap analysis.
• Ensure proper implementation of controls as per NIST guidelines.

5. Document Policies and Procedures

• Create or update cybersecurity policies and procedures to reflect NIST standards.
• Ensure documentation is accessible and understood by relevant personnel.

6. Train Staff

• Conduct training sessions to ensure staff are aware of their roles in compliance.
• Include training on specific controls that are relevant to different roles.

7. Perform Internal Audits

• Conduct internal audits to assess the effectiveness of implemented controls.
• Use findings to refine practices and address any deficiencies.

8. Remediate Issues

• Address any issues identified during internal audits.
• Update documentation and policies as necessary.

9. Review Vendor Compliance

• If applicable, ensure that third-party vendors meet NIST compliance requirements.
• Document vendor compliance as part of your overall NIST audit preparation.

10. Compile Evidence of Compliance

• Gather documentation, policies, audit logs, and other evidence of compliance.
• Organize evidence to correspond with specific NIST controls.

11. Conduct Pre-Audit Review

• Perform a final review of your compliance status before the audit.
• Address any last-minute gaps or issues.

12. Engage with Auditors

• Be prepared to provide auditors with access to documentation, evidence, and personnel.
• Ensure key personnel are available to answer auditors’ questions.

Continuous Improvement

• Treat the NIST audit as a continuous improvement process rather than a one-time event.
• After the audit, review the findings and implement recommended improvements.
• Plan for regular reviews and updates to your cybersecurity practices to maintain compliance.

By methodically following this checklist, your organization can effectively prepare for a NIST audit, demonstrating a strong commitment to cybersecurity and compliance. To demonstrate compliance, you’ll need to pass a NIST security audit covering everything from risk assessment to incident response and recovery. Several resources are available to assist you with audit preparation, including our own NIST audit guide, Preparing for a NIST Audit: A Step-by-Step Guide. This guide contains a handy audit checklist using NIST SP 800-53.

Other resources are also available to help you prepare for your NIST cybersecurity audit:

• Baldrige Cybersecurity Excellence Builder: This self-assessment tool can help you assess the effectiveness of your cybersecurity risk management efforts and identify how you can improve.
• Cohesive Networks’ “Putting the NIST Cybersecurity Framework to Work”: This guide includes best practices for security audits, compliance, and communication.
• FINSECTECH’s Cybersecurity Framework as a Service: This user-friendly tool helps with the management of cybersecurity frameworks.
• Information Systems Audit and Control Association’s: Implementing the NIST Cybersecurity Framework and Supplementary Toolkit
• Rivial Security’s Vendor Cybersecurity Tool: This is a guide to using the NIST CSF to assess vendor security.

The Department of Homeland Security Industrial Control Systems Cyber Emergency Response Team’s (ICS-CERT) Cyber Security Evaluation Tool (CSET) download, introductory CSET video, and walkthrough video of the Cybersecurity Framework approach within CSET.

Security Impact Analysis (SIA) is a critical process used to evaluate the potential effects of changes or modifications to an information system on the system’s security posture. This analysis is essential in maintaining the integrity, confidentiality, and availability of data within the system throughout its lifecycle, especially when updates, patches, or configuration changes are proposed. The primary goal of SIA is to identify and mitigate any adverse impacts on security controls, vulnerabilities, and overall system risk level before implementing changes. In other words, it is critical to the change control process for any security process change requests.

Key Steps in Security Impact Analysis

1. Identification of Proposed Changes: The process begins with a detailed description of the proposed changes, including software updates, hardware replacements, system configuration adjustments, or process modifications.
2. Assessment of Security Controls: Evaluate how the proposed changes may affect existing security controls. Determine if the changes will weaken, strengthen, or have no impact on the current security measures in place.
3. Vulnerability Assessment: Analyze whether the changes introduce any new vulnerabilities or exacerbate existing ones. Consider the use of automated vulnerability scanning tools to identify potential weaknesses.
4. Risk Evaluation: Assess the potential risks associated with the proposed changes. This involves understanding the likelihood of a security breach or incident as a result of the changes and the potential impact on the organization’s operations, assets, or individuals.
5. Mitigation Strategies: If the analysis identifies potential adverse impacts on the system’s security, develop and propose mitigation strategies to address these risks. This could involve additional security controls, changes to the proposed modifications, or alternative solutions that minimize risk.
6. Documentation: Thoroughly document the security impact analysis process, findings, and decisions. This documentation should include details of the proposed changes, the analysis methodology, identified risks, and mitigation strategies.
7. Approval Process: The findings of the security impact analysis should be reviewed and approved by relevant stakeholders, including security teams, system owners, and possibly a governance or risk management committee, depending on the organization’s policies.
8. Implementation and Monitoring: Once approved, the changes can be implemented. Continuous monitoring is essential to ensure that the modifications do not negatively impact the system’s security and that the mitigation strategies are effective.

Best Practices for Security Impact Analysis

• Early Integration: Integrate SIA early and throughout the change management process to identify and address security concerns proactively.
• Comprehensive Approach: Consider all aspects of system security, including physical, technical, and administrative controls, to ensure a holistic analysis.
• Stakeholder Engagement: Engage all relevant stakeholders throughout the SIA process for comprehensive risk identification and buy-in on mitigation strategies.
• Regular Reviews: Conduct SIAs regularly, not just for significant changes, to manage evolving risks and ensure continuous protection of the information system.
• Leverage Automation: Utilize automated tools for continuous monitoring and vulnerability scanning to support the SIA process efficiently.

By conducting thorough Security Impact Analyses, organizations can safeguard their information systems against potential security threats introduced by system changes, ensuring the ongoing confidentiality, integrity, and availability of their data.

Steps to Becoming NIST 800-53 Compliant

Government agencies and their third-party contractors must comply with FISMA, the Federal Information Security Modernization Act (originally known as the Federal Information Security Management Act). Compliance with the NIST 800-53 standard helps them reach that goal. 

Toward that end, NIST has published a list of nine steps to achieve compliance.

1. Categorize data and information you need to protect.
2. Develop a baseline for the minimum number of controls required to protect that information.
3. Conduct risk assessments to refine your baseline controls.
4. Document your baseline controls in a written security plan.
5. Roll out security controls to your information systems.
6. Once the controls are implemented, monitor their performance.
7. Determine your risk based on your assessment of security controls.
8. Authorize your information system for processing.
9. Conduct continuous monitoring of your security controls.

Private-sector organizations that contract with the U.S. Defense Department may be required to comply with FISMA and NIST 800-171, since the latter helps you achieve compliance with DFARS, the federal contracting rule for defense contractors.

One important point here is that NIST 800-53 and NIST 800-171 both require an audit as part of compliance. (NIST CSF is designed only as guidance, and has no audit requirement.) 

Our NIST audit guide walks you through the process step-by-step so you’ll be prepared when the auditor walks through your door. But in general, you’ll need to complete these key steps to assure your organization’s compliance with NIST :

Step 1: Create a NIST Compliance Risk Management Assessment

NIST 800-53 outlines precise controls and provides supplemental guidance for creating a proper risk assessment. NIST 800-171, however, provides only a few sentences describing the risk assessment process. So even if you’re striving to comply with NIST 800-171, you’ll need to refer to NIST 800-53 during the risk assessment phase .

Step 2: Design and implement NIST-compliant access controls

The contracting agency may prescribe controls; your organizational risk assessment should support them. NIST 800-53 and NIST 800-171 guide how to design, implement, and operate needed controls.

Step 3: Monitor your controls

Monitor the controls you implement regularly to identify outlier transactions or deficiencies.

Step 4: Prepare for your third-party audit/assessment

Both NIST 800-53 and 800-171 require audit programs. Governance, risk, and compliance software can help with this step. ZenGRC , for instance, conducts unlimited self-audits with just a few clicks and stores all your audit documentation in one place. Consider it the “single source of truth” repository for easy access at audit time.

Step 5: Create a plan of action and milestones to measure your compliance success

ZenGRC can help with this, and with every aspect of NIST compliance management: assessing your risk and NIST compliance gaps, telling you what controls you need to implement, walking you step-by-step through the process all the way to the finish, and managing and organizing your audit documentation.

Doesn’t that sound much easier than juggling spreadsheets?

Step 6: Submit for your Authorization to Operate (ATO)

An authorization-to-operate (ATO) is necessary before you begin providing IT services or handling confidential data of your government agency customer. To secure the ATO, you’ll need to complete a NIST audit. Our NIST audit guide leads you step-by-step through the process of preparing for this audit.

Step 7: Repeat your risk assessment

Monitoring your risk factors will help you determine how often you should reassess your cybersecurity risk.

NIST 800-53 lists six steps in the NIST Risk Management Framework for managing risk:

1. Categorize the information system.
2. Select the applicable security control baseline.
3. Implement the security controls and document the design, development, and implementation details for the controls.
4. Assess the security controls to determine the extent to which the controls are implemented correctly, operating as intended, and producing the desired outcome to meet the security requirements for the system.
5. Authorize information system operation based on determining risk to organizational operations and assets, individuals, other organizations, and the Nation resulting from the operation and use of the information system and the decision that this risk is acceptable.

Monitor the security and controls in the information system and environment of operation on an ongoing basis to determine control effectiveness, changes to the IT environment, and compliance with legislation, executive orders, directives, policies, regulations, and standards.

NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology), FedRAMP (Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program), and FISMA (Federal Information Security Management Act) form a cohesive framework guiding cybersecurity efforts, particularly for entities working with the U.S. federal government. These components are interconnected, each playing a unique role in shaping a robust cybersecurity posture for federal government contractors and agencies. Imagine them as integral parts of a mechanism where NIST acts as the foundational guideline, akin to the cornerstone that supports and enhances the functionality of the other elements.

FISMA Overview

FISMA mandates comprehensive information protection and cybersecurity for U.S. government systems, impacting a broad spectrum of entities:

• Federal agencies
• State agencies managing federal data
• Organizations handling federal funds
• Private-sector entities engaged with federal grants, programs, or contracts

Compliance with FISMA is primarily achieved through adherence to NIST SP 800-53 standards. Organizations must secure an Authority to Operate (ATO) from each federal agency they serve, with security assessments conducted either by the agency itself or by an approved third-party assessor (3PAO).

FedRAMP Explained

FedRAMP facilitates the secure adoption of cloud computing services by federal agencies, acting as a benchmark for cloud service providers (CSPs). Achieving FedRAMP compliance signifies that a CSP has met rigorous security standards, allowing them to enter a specialized marketplace for government contracts. This compliance eliminates the need for individual agencies to conduct separate security evaluations, streamlining the procurement process.

The Crucial Role of NIST

NIST‘s cybersecurity frameworks, particularly NIST SP 800-53, lay the groundwork for compliance with both FISMA and FedRAMP. Entities looking to engage in government contracts must first align their cybersecurity practices with NIST‘s standards. This alignment not only positions businesses to comply with federal requirements but also establishes a foundation for meeting other security standards, such as HIPAA.

NIST, through its comprehensive frameworks, essentially sets the “gold standard” for cybersecurity, making compliance with FedRAMP and FISMA both rigorous and rewarding. Achieving these certifications can open doors to government contracts and signal to non-federal clients that an organization adheres to high security standards.

Streamlining Compliance

The journey to compliance with NIST, FedRAMP, and FISMA can be complex and demanding. However, leveraging guidance from NIST and utilizing resources designed to facilitate compliance can significantly ease this process. By understanding and implementing the NIST framework, organizations can navigate the requirements of FedRAMP and FISMA more effectively, securing their path to valuable government contracts and establishing a strong cybersecurity framework that benefits all stakeholders.

In summary, NIST provides the essential framework that underpins both FISMA and FedRAMP, enabling organizations to meet federal cybersecurity requirements and engage in government contracting with confidence.

When navigating the landscape of cybersecurity standards, organizations often encounter the NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) frameworks and SOC 2 (Service Organization Control 2), each serving distinct purposes in the realm of information security. Developed by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), SOC 2 complements the suite of NIST frameworks, including the NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF), NIST SP 800-53, and NIST SP 800-171, by providing a focus on data security and privacy for service providers.

Purpose and Design

• NIST Frameworks: Primarily aimed at enhancing cybersecurity within U.S. critical infrastructure providers (e.g., energy, financial services), the NIST frameworks offer guidelines for creating, implementing, and managing an information security program. NIST SP 800-53 and NIST SP 800-171 specify security controls for federal agencies and their contractors to meet compliance requirements under FISMA and DFARS, respectively.
• SOC 2: Tailored for service organizations, including cloud services and payment processors, SOC 2 assessments evaluate the effectiveness of data security and privacy controls against five trust services criteria: Security, Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality, and Privacy.

Core Principles vs. Trust Services Criteria

• NIST CSF operates on five core functions: Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, and Recover, offering a strategic view of an organization’s cybersecurity readiness and response capabilities.
• SOC 2 focuses on the aforementioned trust services criteria, emphasizing the operational aspects of security and privacy controls within service organizations.

Target Audience

• NIST frameworks are designed for use by cybersecurity professionals tasked with developing and implementing cybersecurity measures within organizations, especially those engaged with federal agencies.
• SOC 2 is intended for auditors assessing the control environment of service providers to ensure they meet the security and privacy needs of their clients.

Intersection and Compliance

• Organizations can leverage NIST SP 800-53 controls to meet SOC 2 requirements, demonstrating how these frameworks can be complementary.
• While NIST compliance is generally voluntary (but essential for federal agencies and contractors), SOC 2 compliance is sought voluntarily by service organizations to assure clients of their data security and privacy measures.

Compatibility with Other Frameworks

• The NIST CSF is versatile, aiding organizations in aligning with various other standards, such as ISO 27001 and HIPAA, through its comprehensive approach to cybersecurity risk management.
• SOC 2’s specificity to service organizations makes it a critical standard for those needing to prove their commitment to data security and privacy, particularly in client engagements.

Deciding between NIST and SOC 2—or determining how to integrate both into an organization’s cybersecurity strategy—depends on the organization’s specific needs, regulatory requirements, and the nature of its operations. For entities involved in federal contracts, NIST frameworks are indispensable. For service organizations seeking to establish trust with clients about their data handling practices, SOC 2 offers a path to demonstrate adherence to high standards of security and privacy.

• When navigating the realm of cybersecurity risk management, organizations often encounter two major frameworks: NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) and ISO (International Organization for Standardization). While both sets of standards aim to bolster cybersecurity defenses, they differ significantly in their purpose, audience, methodology, and certification processes.
  

  Purpose and Scope

  • NIST: Primarily focused on enhancing the security of federal information systems in the United States, NIST standards, including the Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) and various special publications, are tailored to meet the needs of U.S. federal agencies and critical infrastructure entities. NIST standards are instrumental in helping these organizations protect their networks, systems, and data from cyber threats.
  • ISO: The ISO 27000 series, with a global perspective, is designed to aid private, public, and multinational companies in establishing and maintaining information security management systems (ISMS). This series provides a systematic approach to managing sensitive company information so that it remains secure.

  Primary Users

  • NIST: Its standards are predominantly utilized by U.S. federal government agencies and contractors, particularly for compliance with the Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA) and improving cybersecurity practices within critical infrastructure sectors.
  • ISO: Targeting a broader international audience, the ISO 27000 series is widely adopted by private sector companies worldwide, including multinational corporations seeking to standardize their information security management practices.

  Assistive Tools and Technical Focus

  • NIST SP 800-53 offers a comprehensive set of security controls aimed at facilitating compliance with the NIST CSF, providing detailed guidance for implementing and managing information system security.
  • ISO 27002, serving a similar purpose within the ISO framework, outlines a set of best practice guidelines for information security management, assisting organizations in achieving ISO 27001 compliance.

  Despite their differences, both NIST 800-53 and ISO 27002 offer frameworks for establishing robust cybersecurity controls. However, NIST 800-53 is noted for its more detailed technical specifications compared to the more risk-focused ISO 27002.

  Structure and Certification

  • Structure: NIST 800-53 is organized into 20 control families with a comprehensive catalog of controls. Conversely, ISO 27001 outlines 14 control categories encompassing 114 controls, offering a structured approach to information security.
  • Certification: Unlike NIST, which does not offer an official certification process (organizations typically self-attest to compliance), ISO 27001 certification can be obtained through formal audits conducted by accredited auditors. This certification process underscores ISO’s international acceptance and recognition for establishing a certified ISMS.

  Choosing between NIST and ISO standards depends on several factors, including the organization’s geographic location, sector, and specific regulatory compliance requirements. While NIST provides a robust framework tailored to U.S. federal and critical infrastructure needs, ISO offers a globally recognized certification process that appeals to a wide array of international businesses. Ultimately, both frameworks serve to enhance an organization’s cybersecurity posture, but their applicability and implementation will vary based on distinct organizational needs and objectives.

Managing a NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) security plan requires a structured approach, combining organizational commitment with the right tools and strategies. Whether you’re aligning with the NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF), NIST SP 800-53, or NIST SP 800-171, here are tips and tools to help you effectively manage and maintain your NIST security plan.

Tips for Managing a NIST Security Plan

1. Understand the Framework: Familiarize yourself and your team with the specific NIST guidelines you’re implementing. Whether it’s CSF, SP 800-53, or SP 800-171, understanding the framework’s core functions, controls, and objectives is crucial.
2. Conduct a Gap Analysis: Identify where your current security practices stand in comparison to NIST standards. A gap analysis will highlight areas of compliance and areas needing improvement.
3. Develop a Comprehensive Strategy: Create a strategy that addresses the identified gaps. This should include timelines, responsible parties, and specific actions to meet NIST standards.
4. Implement Security Controls: Prioritize and implement the necessary security controls. Consider both technical and administrative controls that support your security objectives.
5. Train Your Team: Ensure that all employees understand their roles in maintaining security according to NIST standards. Regular training and awareness programs can help reinforce this knowledge.
6. Monitor and Review Regularly: Continuous monitoring of your security controls and practices is essential. Regular reviews allow you to adjust your security plan as your organization or the threat landscape changes.
7. Leverage Documentation: Keep detailed records of policies, procedures, and security measures implemented. Documentation is critical for internal audits and proving compliance during external assessments.

Tools for Managing a NIST Security Plan

1. Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Systems: Tools like Splunk, LogRhythm, or IBM QRadar can help you collect, analyze, and report on security data and incidents, aligning with NIST‘s continuous monitoring requirements.
2. Compliance Management Software: Software solutions such as RSA Archer, Tenable.sc, or Microsoft Compliance Manager can simplify compliance with NIST standards by providing frameworks, checklists, and tools for managing documentation and assessments.
3. Policy and Procedure Management Tools: Platforms like PolicyTech or PowerDMS offer centralized management for policies and procedures, ensuring they are up to date and accessible to relevant stakeholders.
4. Vulnerability Assessment Tools: Tools like Qualys, Rapid7, or Tenable Nessus help identify and prioritize vulnerabilities in your systems, an essential part of both identifying and protecting functions within NIST frameworks.
5. Employee Training Platforms: Solutions such as KnowBe4 or Proofpoint Security Awareness Training can help in educating employees about cybersecurity best practices and their specific responsibilities under NIST compliance.
6. Document Control Systems: Systems that manage document lifecycle, version control, and access permissions, such as Microsoft SharePoint or Google Workspace, are vital for maintaining the integrity and availability of compliance documentation.
7. Risk Assessment Tools: Tools that facilitate risk assessments and management, aligning with NIST‘s risk management strategies. Examples include RiskLens, GRC tools like ServiceNow, or specialized software like CRISAM.

Implementing and managing a NIST security plan is an ongoing process that requires commitment across the organization. By leveraging these tips and tools, you can create a robust security posture that not only meets NIST standards but also strengthens your overall cybersecurity defenses.

For more detailed information, check out NIST’s Tips and Tactics on How to Deal With Ransomware Attacks.

Automating your NIST compliance management can significantly streamline the process, reducing manual effort, minimizing errors, and enhancing overall efficiency. Here’s how you can leverage automation to manage NIST compliance, whether it’s for the NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF), NIST SP 800-53, or NIST SP 800-171.

1. Understand Your Compliance Requirements

• Comprehend the NIST Standards: Start by thoroughly understanding the specific NIST standards applicable to your organization. This will guide your automation strategy effectively.

2. Identify Automation-Friendly Areas

• Compliance Mapping: Use tools that can automatically map your existing controls to NIST standards, identifying gaps and redundancies.
• Risk Management: Implement software that can automate the risk assessment process, including identifying, analyzing, and prioritizing risks.
• Security Gap Analysis: Leverage tools that can automatically scan your systems and processes to identify compliance gaps against NIST requirements.

3. Choose the Right GRC Software

• Research and Select GRC Tools: Opt for GRC software that offers features for compliance management, risk assessment, and monitoring tailored to NIST standards. Tools like RSA Archer, ServiceNow GRC, or ZenGRC are known for their comprehensive capabilities.
• Integration Capabilities: Ensure the software can integrate with your existing IT infrastructure and security tools for seamless compliance management.

4. Automate Documentation and Reporting

• Policy and Procedure Management: Use automation tools to manage the lifecycle of documents, ensuring policies and procedures are up-to-date and compliant.
• Automatic Reporting: Implement solutions that generate compliance reports automatically, saving time and ensuring accuracy for audits and reviews.

5. Streamline Third-Party Risk Management

• Vendor Assessment Tools: Utilize platforms that automate the assessment of third-party vendors’ compliance with NIST standards, simplifying the oversight of your supply chain‘s security posture.

6. Implement Continuous Monitoring

• Security Information and Event Management (SIEM): Deploy SIEM systems that offer real-time monitoring and alerting for potential security incidents, ensuring continuous adherence to NIST guidelines.
• Vulnerability Scanning and Remediation: Automate the process of vulnerability scanning and apply automated remediation where possible to maintain compliance.

7. Conduct Regular Automated Audits

• Compliance Auditing Tools: Schedule regular automated compliance audits using your GRC platform to ensure ongoing adherence to NIST standards and identify areas for improvement.

8. Train Your Team on Automated Tools

• Awareness and Training: Ensure your team is well-versed in using the automated tools and understands the importance of NIST compliance. Continuous education can help in maximizing the benefits of automation.

9. Review and Adjust Your Automation Strategies

• Regular Evaluation: Periodically review the effectiveness of your automation strategies and make adjustments as needed. Compliance landscapes and organizational environments change, necessitating updates to your approach.

By automating NIST compliance management, organizations can ensure a more streamlined, accurate, and efficient compliance process. This not only saves valuable time and resources but also significantly enhances your cybersecurity posture in alignment with NIST’s rigorous standards.

The NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) framework provides a structured approach to managing changes in IT systems and processes, ensuring they are implemented securely and efficiently. The change management process outlined by NIST is crucial for maintaining the integrity, security, and reliability of information systems. Here are the key components of this process:

1. Identification: Changes, whether they are software updates, hardware replacements, or modifications to processes, must first be identified. This involves recognizing the need for a change and outlining its scope and impact.
2. Classification: Once identified, changes are classified according to their urgency, risk, and impact on the IT environment. This classification helps in prioritizing changes and applying the appropriate level of scrutiny and approval.
3. Assessment: A thorough assessment of the proposed change is conducted to understand its implications on system security and operations. This includes evaluating potential risks, resource requirements, and the change’s alignment with organizational policies and standards.
4. Approval: Changes must be approved by authorized personnel or change advisory boards. Approval is based on the assessment phase, taking into consideration the change’s benefits, costs, and risks.
5. Implementation: Approved changes are carefully implemented, ensuring that they are carried out in a controlled manner. This may involve testing in a staging environment before deployment in the production environment.
6. Documentation and Communication: All changes are documented, including the rationale, implementation details, and outcomes. Communication is essential throughout the change management process, ensuring that all stakeholders are informed and prepared for the change.
7. Review and Post-Implementation Analysis: After implementation, the change is reviewed to assess its effectiveness and identify any unforeseen impacts or issues. Lessons learned are documented to improve future change management processes.

How does the NIST change management process integrate with ITIL best practices?

The NIST change management process can be effectively integrated with ITIL (Information Technology Infrastructure Library) best practices to enhance IT service management and security. ITIL provides a comprehensive set of guidelines for IT service management, including change management, and aligns well with NIST‘s focus on security and risk management. Here’s how they integrate:

1. Structured Approach: Both NIST and ITIL emphasize a structured approach to change management, prioritizing changes based on risk and impact. Integrating NIST’s security focus within the ITIL change management lifecycle enhances the overall security posture.
2. Risk Management: NIST‘s emphasis on assessing and mitigating risks associated with changes complements ITIL‘s process of evaluating the potential impact of changes. Together, they ensure that changes do not compromise system security or service quality.
3. Change Approval: ITIL‘s Change Advisory Board (CAB) concept can be used to incorporate NIST’s requirement for change approval by relevant authorities. This ensures that changes are scrutinized for security implications and authorized appropriately.
4. Continuous Improvement: Both frameworks advocate for continuous improvement in the change management process. NIST’s post-implementation review aligns with ITIL’s Continual Service Improvement (CSI) phase, allowing organizations to learn from each change and enhance future processes.
5. Documentation and Communication: NIST and ITIL both stress the importance of thorough documentation and effective communication throughout the change management process. This ensures transparency, accountability, and a clear understanding of changes among all stakeholders.

By integrating NIST change management processes with ITIL best practices, organizations can ensure that changes are implemented in a secure, efficient, and controlled manner, minimizing risks and maximizing the benefits of IT services.

ZenGRC does everything you and your team can do for NIST compliance, but faster and more thoroughly. From the moment you log in to our software-as-a-service (SaaS) platform, ZenGRC performs the time-consuming drudge work so you don’t have to, including:

• Conducting a risk assessment of your information systems and those of your third-party vendors to see where you comply and where you fall short, and enhance your asset management.
• Creating a plan of action and milestones for systems security and displaying it on user-friendly dashboards so you can see in real-time what needs to be done and who needs to do it.
• Mapping all compliance efforts and frameworks to avoid duplication so you can use your time and money more wisely.
• Providing continuous monitoring of your systems and flagging you when changes occur that could threaten your NIST compliance.
• Updating itself when NIST changes.
• Conducting automated, unlimited self-audits and organizing your documents in a “single source of truth” repository for easy retrieval at audit time.

No more hunting for documentation; no more searching emails or toggling screens: ZenGRC’s centralized, at-a-glance dashboards and simplified self-assessments can make aligning to NIST worry-free. Then, you and your team can focus on keeping your data, systems, and networks secure and operational and your clients and customers happy.

Contact us now for a free ZenGRC demo.

How to Upgrade Your Cyber Risk Management Program with NIST

GET FREE GUIDE